...
Responsible Person: | |||||||||||||
Other parties to review/input: | |||||||||||||
FYI: | |||||||||||||
Targeted release date: |
| ||||||||||||
Jira Status: |
|
Process
- Prepare rough business analysis/reqs doc (Christina Riley: IN PROGRESS)
- Get CHAI review
- Get Akros Review
- Get Ona feedback
- One iteration
- Ona sign off
- Ona tech spec scoping
- Ona LOE
- Ona scheduling
Definitions
- DT comment: Christina Riley, can you please review and validate these definitions?
- Inactive structure: a non-valid structure that was created erroneously and should be removed from play completely (e.g., duplicate residential structure record created by accident)
- Ineligible structure: a valid structure that is ineligible to participate in an intervention for a valid reason (e.g., a residential structure where the inhabitants are not currently residing, but may return in the future)
Notes
- The ability to mark a structure as ineligible is the priority feature - the feature to mark structures as ineligible can be developed in a future release
- No structures are ever deleted from Reveal, they can only be marked as inactive
Requirements
- Any structures that have been marked as ineligible should be removed from the target denominator for the intervention
- Ineligibility is intervention-specific (e.g., Christina Riley: can you add an example?)
- Christina Riley: can you please describe the envisaged workflow for a user to determine a structure is ineligible, and then to mark it so?
Views
We anticipate the following views to be impacted on with the creation of this feature:
Justification
Dependencies
Questions
Test Case
# | Step | Pass / Fail | Comment |
---|---|---|---|
1 | |||
2 | |||
3 | |||
4 | |||
5 | |||
6 | |||
7 | |||
8 | |||
Additional tester comments: |