Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

Table Of Contents

...

#StepStatus
1Responsible prepares rough business analysis/reqs doc
COMPLETE Pierre Dane
2Get CHAI reviewCOMPLETE Vivek Agrawal
3Get Akros ReviewCOMPLETE Christina Riley
4Get Ona feedback

COMPLETE Craig Appl

5Responsible - 1 iteration for feedback

Pierre Dane, please perform the following:

  • Review my comments
  • Add a card view - Do we need to display the comments directly in the card,(I think just open the form)
  • Please add a sheet to the data dictionary defining the form fields
  • Please update the Generic Add location sheet in the Reveal data dictionary to reflect this new option

    COMPLETE Pierre Dane

    6Ona sign off
    7Ona tech spec scoping
    8Ona LOE 
    9Ona scheduling

    ...

    • It can be in close proximity to a mosquito collection point, larval dipping site or a structure
    • It can be within or outside of an operational area
    • It can be a distinct thing next to a residential structure
    • Identifying PAOTs  is part of the Thai protocol and is currently done on hand-drawn maps
    • Dropping a point for or editing a potential Source area of Transmission should not be restricted by GPS proximity (unlike interaction with other structures)

    Requirements

    1. OVERVIEW: A user should be able to add an icon (possibly similar to the image of Plasmodium Gametocyte below) to TBD) to the Reveal Android map showing a Potential Area of Transmission (PAOT). 
    2. FORM FIELDS: The user should be able to add a comment to the PAOT form (not mandatory) - maximum string size tbc (2000 chars? this should be the same as other comment fields in Reveal) specify the type of PAOT from a drop-down (list to be provided - 'Pond, Cave, Forest) (Pedro Pagalday Olivares to confirm this please)
    3. FORM FIELDS:
      1. The comment field (task/form) should be editable Craig Appl - can you verify that each time this data is saved that a new form is submitted to the server (same data workflow as mosq collection point & larval dipping).
      2. This is the The date that the PAOT was recorded - this field is mandatory. Each time a PAOT is identified during an FI this data should be recorded .and displayed on the card view
      3. We should be able to see a historical view of the comments & dates recorded as a PAOT in the web UI & supersets.(low priority)
    4. REQUIREDNESS: It is not mandatory to add a PAOT to a focus
    5. LIFECYCLE: The PAOT will persist across subsequent FI, but should be able to be removed (set to inactive) I.e. they do not expire
    6. LIFECYCLE: The addition of a  POAT to a focus area will, in general, be a .once off task performed during the first visit
    7. USAGE: The PAOT data should be synced to the Reveal WebUI and be visible in the Web UI maps (high priority)
    8. USAGE: The PAOT data should be as a line listing reports (to be mocked up) (low priority) - the comment should display when clicking the POAT icon in the WebUI
    9. USAGE: The PAOT should be synced to Biophics in the same way that other tasks are (high priority) - this is where the BVBD will analyse the data
    10. PLANNING: The PAOT activity will not be part of a plan activity
    11. TASK STATUS: The PAOT can be coulored yellow when it is created:
      1. Once selected and the data comment field is filled out, the color will turn to green for status of 'Completed'.
    12. LINKAGE: One focus area can have multiple PAOTs
    13. LINKAGE: The PAOT is associated to a focus area and not explicitly to an Index Case. This linkage can be assumed through the 1:1 mapping of focus area and index case per plan. However, the PAOT is not necessarily related to the index or secondary cases in the focus i.e. it is a potential area of transmission, not THE  THE potential area of transmission for the cases in the focus at that time.
    14. EDGE CASE: A PAOT is NEVER another type of structure, and if a structure is identified as a potential source then a PAOT should be added alongside the existing structure
      1. A potential issue raised is what happens with very large structures (Markets, football fields) as PAOT cannot be dropped on top of this - Vivek confirmed that this was discussed with BVBD and placing a pit next to the structure with a comment is sufficient

    Mock-Ups

      Image Removed Image Added

    Adding a PAOT                                              PAOT Form                                            Card View

    ...

    • Vivek - purpose: for targeted interventions, could visually see if there is a correlation of infection for more than one focus. they do this on paper at the moment. It is a critical piece of protocol for the Thai team.
    • Was this mentioned in the initial first visit? To confirm with Pedro
    • Data should be surfaced in web UI and pushed through to Biophics (not for this version though) 
    • You need to be able to define an area of transmission as part of the focus investigation

    ...

    Questions

    1. This feature has been described as a Potential Source of Infection (POI) and a Potential Source of Transmission- which is correct?
      1. Confirmed by Vivek Agrawal as Potential Area of Transmission (PAOT)
    2. Was this requirement mentioned during the initial first visit? To confirm with Pedro

    ...