Page Comparison

...

Livashan Soobramoney pls help us to answer the questions below 

Updated 6.23.20

1. Will health workers be visiting a combination of homes already registered and identified in Reveal and "unspecified structures" during this campaign, or only "unspecified structures?"
   1. The answer to this question directly impacts how we build our issue QR code workflow 
2.  Our assumption is that QR codes will only be issued to any families registered at their homes - is this correct?
3. The requirements above mentions a family list view in addition to a task list view - is there any reason that the user would need to look through a list of floating families
   1. What would that use case be?
   2. Is it sufficient to be able to search for families, see search results, and then enter the family module to view members and forms?
   3. The distinction between two list views (lists of floating families versus lists of tasks) could be a bit confusing to end users, so we'd prefer to maintain a single view unless there are other business requirements here we're missing  
4. Has any additional conversation been had on workflow 4 (searching clients across OAs) that is not documented above? Our understanding is that a final decision had not been reached on an implementation path, is that correct?
   1. How realistic is Has it that users at health facilities will have connectivity in Zambia?
   Our assumption is that the reporting requirements in the Reporting Data Dictionary shared above have
   1. been confirmed that mop up days are a part of this new pilot?
   2. Our recommended way forward: if these mop up days are happening at the health center level (I believe this is level 3 in Zambia), we can fit all of that client data on a device and no global search is needed. I believe in Zambia right now, we can actually fit data from 3 health centers on to a single device. If that is sufficient, we can just create credentials at that level and allow the user to search through all clients already synced to phone. 
   3. If that is not sufficient, we need to have a conversation here ASAP, as global search introduces an immense amount of complexity in terms of client management  
5. Our assumption is that the reporting requirements for both the web AND Android apps have not been updated for this implementation - is this correct? 
   1. Web - It references % of people screened, and % of case-triggered FIsTest Case
   2. Android - it references something about PZQ received - those returned and distributed → this is not data we are collecting 
6. Have any decisions been made about what drug will be dispensed in this trial? 
   1. When will the data dictionary be updated?
   2. We are assuming that this program will only be dispensing a single dose of the drug 
   3. No adverse drug reaction reporting is included above - pls confirm this
   4. Has "eligibility" been defined yet?

...