NOTE: Ineligible Structure Marking for Focus InvestigationFamily Module IS A SEPARATE SCOPING DOCUMENT
Table of Contents |
---|
Page Properties | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Status
# | Step | Status |
---|---|---|
1 | Responsible prepares rough business analysis/reqs doc | IN PROGRESS: Pierre Dane |
2 | Get CHAI review | |
3 | Get Akros Review | |
4 | Get Ona feedback | |
5 | Responsible - 1 iteration for feedback | |
6 | Ona sign off | |
7 | Ona tech spec scoping | |
8 | Ona LOE | |
9 | Ona scheduling |
...
- A user in the field should be able to select a structure displayed in the Reveal map and mark it as inactive
- Q:
A user on the WebUI should be able to select a structure displayed in the Reveal map and mark it as inactive - The user should be asked to confirm this process before the operation is completed
- Tasks associated with this structure should also be marked as inactive
- Any structures that have been marked as inactive should be removed from the target denominator for all interventions
- Any historical data for that structure should no longer be measured as part of any indicators.
- Inactivity is not intervention-specific and applies to all interventions.Structures that are eligible to be marked as inactive include:
- Structures created during enumeration that do not actually exist in the field. Structures erroneously added in the field
- We need to think about the downstream management of this 'inactive' structure with regards to potential CGR integration as well
- Lifecycle: a structure marked as inactive is inactive indefinitely. If another structure is built in that same exact GPS position, a new location would have to be added.
Workflow
- Structure created erroneously in one of two ways:
- Incorrectly enumerated
- Added in field accidentally (e.g. duplicates of other structures, inaccurate locations of existing structures, other user-error additions, etc.).
...
- The user navigates to the
...
- physical location of the structure as guided by the map view of the mobile client and
...
- confirms that this structure does not exist.
- Tap the structure.
- If no household has been registered:
- If no household has been registered:
...
- Structure Registration form/task presented to user before household registration
...
- :
- New field
- :
...
- : Select type of structure
...
- (similar to IRS view)
- Residential structure
- Non-residential structure
- Non-existent structure - mark as inactive
- If non-residential A follow on question should ask "What type of structure is this?"
- "Kitchen", "Animal shelter", "Food storage", "School", "Lodge", "Shop", "Office", "Hospital", "Clinic", "No structure here", "Not habitable", "Other"
- If residential, next screen proceeds to ask questions about eligibility, see Ineligible Structure Marking for Family Module
- (similar to IRS view)
- If household has been registered:
...
- We assume that a family has been incorrectly registered to this structure and should be moved to a correct structure
- Tap the three dots in the upper right-hand corner
- Select 'Move family registration'
- Search & select the relevant structure from the displayed map view or list view
- We assume that a family has been incorrectly registered to this structure and should be moved to a correct structure
...
Mock-Ups
Views
We anticipate the following views to be impacted on with the creation of this feature:
...
- OR add a new structure for that family
- Recommend having a radius of selection, i.e. can only move family registration to a structure within 100m
- What to do for structures outside of this radius? Is it possible to create a holding table for registered families without a structure?
- If no family already registered to new structure - Save
- If family already registered to the structure:
- New form: Is this a multi-structure household?
- Recommend having a radius of selection, i.e. can only move family registration to a structure within 100m
- Tap the SAME structure that has been identified as inactive
- OR add a new structure for that family
...
- New field - Structure registration: Select type of structure:
- Residential structure
- Non-residential structure
- Non-existent structure - mark as inactive
- Follow steps 3.a.i.
Suggested MVP
Workflow: 1- 3a:
- User can mark inactive structure that do not have any family registration information already collected.
Views:
- Android - Structure registration form
- Android - Maps - Add colour coding for ineligible (grey) & inactive structures (black)
- Android - Maps - Add a card view for inactive structures
Suggested not in MVP
Workflow: 3b
- Ability to mark a structure inactive if it already has family registration. This includes functionality to:
- Register a multi-structure household
- Move a family from one household to another
Views:
- Android - New options in family view to:
- Mark as ineligible for current intervention
- Move registered household to new structure
- Android - New form in family view to move registered household to new structure
- Android - Maps - Add colour coding for ineligible (black) & inactive structures (light grey)
- Android - Maps - Add a card view for ineligible structures
- Android - Maps - Add a card view for inactive structures Web - Maps - Display ineligible structures in black in the web view with ability to toggle on/off
Views
We anticipate the following views to be impacted on with the creation of this feature:
Justification
Dependencies
...
- No structures are ever deleted from Reveal, they can only be marked as inactive.
- Data will never be deleted from Reveal, only removed from tables being queried for indicators.
Questions
Test Case
# | Step | Pass / Fail | Comment |
---|---|---|---|
1 | |||
2 | |||
3 | |||
4 | |||
5 | |||
6 | |||
7 | |||
8 | |||
Additional tester comments: |
...