Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 29 Next »

Table Of Contents

Scoping Details

Responsible Person:
Other parties to review/input:
FYI:
Targeted release date:
31st July 2019
Jira Status:
RVL-104 - Getting issue details... STATUS

The responsible person owns this feature from scoping to tracking development by Ona and providing clarifications if needed, to testing and sign off.  Status

Status

#StepStatus
1Responsible prepares rough business analysis/reqs doc
COMPLETE Pierre Dane
2Get CHAI reviewCOMPLETE Vivek Agrawal
3Get Akros ReviewCOMPLETE Christina Riley
4Get Ona feedback

COMPLETE Craig Appl

5Responsible - 1 iteration for feedback

COMPLETE Pierre Dane

6Ona sign offCOMPLETE Craig Appl
7Ona tech spec scopingIN PROGRESS  Craig Appl
8Ona LOE 
9Ona scheduling

Definitions

A Potential Area of Transmission (PAOT) can be a variety of things:

  • It can be in close proximity to a mosquito collection point, larval dipping site or a structure
  • It can be within or outside of an operational area
  • It can be a distinct thing next to a residential structure
  • Identifying PAOTs  is part of the Thai protocol and is currently done on hand-drawn maps
  • Dropping a point for or editing a potential area of Transmission should not be restricted by GPS proximity

Requirements

  1. OVERVIEW: A user should be able to add an icon (TBD) to the Reveal Android map showing a Potential Area of Transmission (PAOT). 
  2. FORM FIELDS: The user should be able to add a comment to the PAOT form (not mandatory) - maximum string size tbc (2000 chars? this should be the same as other comment fields in Reveal) specify the type of PAOT from a drop-down (list to be provided - 'Pond, Cave, Forest) (Pedro Pagalday Olivares to confirm this please)
  3. FORM FIELDS:
    1. The comment field (task/form) should be editable Craig Appl - can you verify that each time this data is saved that a new form is submitted to the server (same data workflow as mosq collection point & larval dipping).
    2. The date that the PAOT was recorded should be recorded and displayed on the card view
    3. We should be able to see a historical view of the comments & dates recorded as a PAOT in the web UI & supersets.(low priority)
  4. REQUIREDNESS: It is not mandatory to add a PAOT to a focus
  5. LIFECYCLE: The PAOT will persist across subsequent FI, but should be able to be removed (set to inactive) I.e. they do not expire
  6. LIFECYCLE: The addition of a  POAT to a focus area will, in general, be a .once off task performed during the first visit
  7. USAGE: The PAOT data should be synced to the Reveal WebUI and be visible in the Web UI maps (high priority)
  8. USAGE: The PAOT data should be as a line listing reports (to be mocked up) (low priority) - the comment should display when clicking the POAT icon in the WebUI
  9. USAGE: The PAOT should be synced to Biophics in the same way that other tasks are (high priority) - this is where the BVBD will analyse the data
  10. PLANNING: The PAOT activity will not be part of a plan activity
  11. TASK STATUS: The PAOT can be coulored yellow when it is created:
    1. Once selected and the comment field is filled out, the color will turn to green for status of 'Completed'.
  12. LINKAGE: One focus area can have multiple PAOTs
  13. LINKAGE: The PAOT is associated to a focus area and not explicitly to an Index Case. This linkage can be assumed through the 1:1 mapping of focus area and index case per plan. However, the PAOT is not necessarily related to the index or secondary cases in the focus i.e. it is a potential area of transmission, not THE potential area of transmission for the cases in the focus at that time.
  14. EDGE CASE: A PAOT is NEVER another type of structure, and if a structure is identified as a potential source then a PAOT should be added alongside the existing structure
    1. A potential issue raised is what happens with very large structures (Markets, football fields) as PAOT cannot be dropped on top of this - Vivek confirmed that this was discussed with BVBD and placing a pit next to the structure with a comment is sufficient

Mock-Ups

 

Adding a PAOT                                              PAOT Form                                            Card View

Views

We anticipate the following views to be impacted on with the creation of this feature:

  • Android - Add structure form
  • Android - Maps - Add a new icon with colour coding
  • Android - Maps - Add a card view when the user taps the POAT
  • Android - New form to collect comments
  • Web - Maps - Display these new icons in the web view
  • Web - Maps - Display comments when the user taps on the POAT in the map (Low priority)

Justification

  1. The Thailand BVBD has requested this feature:
    1. They need to be able to list the PAOT so that they can monitor them and potentially intervene (in active foci).
    2. It is important to be able to measure the most common PAOT in order to decide on intervention types to implement (inputs into epi research, SOPs and policy)

Dependencies

  1. Data Dictionary completed
  2. Icon produced

Notes

  • Vivek - purpose: for targeted interventions, could visually see if there is a correlation of infection for more than one focus. they do this on paper at the moment. It is a critical piece of protocol for the Thai team.
  • Was this mentioned in the initial first visit? To confirm with Pedro
  • Data should be surfaced in web UI and pushed through to Biophics (not for this version though) 
  • You need to be able to define an area of transmission as part of the focus investigation

Questions

  1. This feature has been described as a Potential Source of Infection (POI) and a Potential Source of Transmission- which is correct?
    1. Confirmed by Vivek Agrawal as Potential Area of Transmission (PAOT)
  2. Was this requirement mentioned during the initial first visit? To confirm with Pedro

Test Case

#

Step

Pass / Fail

Comment

1




2




3




4




5




6




7




8




Additional tester comments:







  • No labels