The OpenSRP community performed a self assessment of the platform against the Global Goods Maturity Model in January 2018. This page reflects that self assessment and we anticipate performing another self assessment each year to see the progress of the platform over time. The current version of the Global Good Maturity Model Indicator Definitions can be found a this source.

Global Goods Self Assessment (Evaluated Jun 2019)

Core Indicator and Calculated Score [0-10]	Sub-Indicator	Self Assessment	Description
Global Utility Calculated Score: 7	Country Utilization	Medium	At least four countries or states actively use the tool for use as part of their health information system with at least 20% of total nation-wide or state-wide target users routinely using product/service as intended.
	Country Strategy	Medium	The tool does fully meets digital functional requirements (as defined by WHO's Classification of Digital Health Interventions) without significant customization or configuration
	Digital Health Interventions	High	The tool does fully meets digital functional requirements (as defined by WHO's Classification of Digital Health Interventions) without significant customization or configuration
	Source Code Accessibility	High	Source code exists on a publicly accessible repository and licensed under an Open Source Initiative approved license. Software is structured to allow local customization and new modules and functionality without requiring forking of main code
	Funding and Revenue	Medium	Multiple revenue streams/donors exist across project implementations
Community Calculated Score: 8	Developer, Contributor and Implementer Community Engagement	High	At least 30% of estimated total developers, contributors and implementers are engaged on a communication platform. community leadership includes representation from countries where the tool is deployed
	Community Governance	Medium	Some informal processes for community management exist to direct continued development of the digital health tool
	Software Roadmap	High	New features and functionality are documented as part of a software roadmap as part of a release cycle. There are forums for community members to discuss new feature requests. A clear prioritization process exists and is utilized for the development of new features and functionality as part of a product backlog
	User Documentation	Medium	Some user documentation exists (training manual, demo videos) but only addresses a limited subset of common functionality
	Multi-Lingual Support	High	Software has been translated into multiple languages and fully supports internationalization requirements. There is an easy tool for new translations to be added. Significant parts of user and implementer documentation has been translated into at least one other language.
Software Calculated Score: 4	Technical Documentation	Medium	Some technical documentation exists of the source code, use cases and functional requirements
	Software Productization	Low	No documentation available for deployment and configuration
	Interoperability and Data Accessibility	Medium	Some APIs are available for accessing and managing data. there are user facing interfaces to export core data and metadata in the system (e.g. in CSV format) for further analysis and data transfer purposes
	Security	Medium	Role based authorization exists, if appropriate. Guidance on encrypting all remote access (web interface, APIs) is available to implementers.
	Scalability	Medium	There is at least one jurisdiction (e.g. country, state) deployment for which 20% of all "entities" are managed within the software. There has been at least one evaluation of software performance / load testing

January 2018 Global Goods Self Assessment

Global Goods Self Assessment (Evaluated Jan 2018)

Core Indicator and Calculated Score [0-10]	Sub-Indicator	Self Assessment	Description
Global Utility Calculated Score: 7	Country Utilization	Medium	At least four countries or states actively use the tool for use as part of their health information system with at least 20% of total nation-wide or state-wide target users routinely using product/service as intended.
	Country Strategy	Medium	The tool does fully meets digital functional requirements (as defined by WHO's Classification of Digital Health Interventions) without significant customization or configuration
	Digital Health Interventions	High	The tool does fully meets digital functional requirements (as defined by WHO's Classification of Digital Health Interventions) without significant customization or configuration
	Source Code Accessibility	High	Source code exists on a publicly accessible repository and licensed under an Open Source Initiative approved license. Software is structured to allow local customization and new modules and functionality without requiring forking of main code
	Funding and Revenue	Medium	Multiple revenue streams/donors exist across project implementations
Community Calculated Score: 6	Developer, Contributor and Implementer Community Engagement	High	At least 30% of estimated total developers, contributors and implementers are engaged on a communication platform. community leadership includes representation from countries where the tool is deployed
	Community Governance	Medium	Some informal processes for community management exist to direct continued development of the digital health tool
	Software Roadmap	Medium	There is a publicly accessible and routinely maintained platform for new feature requests. A software roadmap exists describing currently planned and resourced development activities
	User Documentation	Medium	Some user documentation exists (training manual, demo videos) but only addresses a limited subset of common functionality
	Multi-Lingual Support	Medium	Software has be internationalized to support multiple languages (though may not have been translated) for primary portions of the user interface. Some user documentation exists in more than one language
Software Calculated Score: 4	Technical Documentation	Medium	Some technical documentation exists of the source code, use cases and functional requirements
	Software Productization	Low	No documentation available for deployment and configuration
	Interoperability and Data Accessibility	Medium	Some APIs are available for accessing and managing data. there are user facing interfaces to export core data and metadata in the system (e.g. in CSV format) for further analysis and data transfer purposes
	Security	Medium	Role based authorization exists, if appropriate. Guidance on encrypting all remote access (web interface, APIs) is available to implementers.
	Scalability	Medium	There is at least one jurisdiction (e.g. country, state) deployment for which 20% of all "entities" are managed within the software. There has been at least one evaluation of software performance / load testing

Global Goods Self Assessment (Evaluated Jun 2019)

Global Utility

Community

Software

Global Goods Self Assessment (Evaluated Jan 2018)

Global Utility

Community

Software